A foundational concept in the field of language acquisition, this theorem, often attributed to the influence of Noam Chomsky’s linguistic theories, establishes inherent limitations in learning formal languages from positive examples alone. Specifically, it demonstrates that if a language is learnable from positive data, that language must be quite restricted, precluding the learning of a substantial range of possible languages. For instance, imagine trying to learn the grammar of English solely by observing grammatically correct sentences. Without negative examples, it becomes impossible to rule out overly general grammars that accept ungrammatical sentences. This inherent difficulty highlights the necessity of innate constraints or learning biases in the human capacity for language acquisition.
The significance of this theoretical result stems from its implications for understanding how humans, particularly children, acquire language. Given the relative scarcity of explicit corrections in typical language learning environments, the theorem suggests that the human mind must possess pre-existing knowledge or constraints that significantly narrow the search space for possible grammars. This pre-existing knowledge, often referred to as Universal Grammar, allows learners to overcome the limitations imposed by positive evidence alone. Historically, the theorem contributed to a shift in focus from purely behaviorist accounts of language acquisition to more cognitively oriented theories emphasizing the role of innate capacities and internal representations.
