This historical American five-cent piece, often mistakenly described as containing silver, actually comprises 75% copper and 25% nickel. The coin features a Native American on the obverse (front) and an American bison (buffalo) on the reverse (back). The name stems from a common misconception, as no issues of this particular coin were ever struck using silver in their composition for general circulation.
Though not precious metal, examples of this coinage are valuable to collectors due to their historical significance, unique design, and the relative scarcity of certain dates and mint marks. The coin provides insight into early 20th-century American artistry and prevailing cultural perspectives. Moreover, the errors in striking and variations in the die, make the coin a fascinating subject for numismatists.
The following discussion will delve into various aspects relating to these coins, including its production period, factors affecting its value, prominent varieties to look for, grading techniques and how to preserve its numismatic integrity.
1. Misnomer
The persistent association of the term “silver” with this particular coin presents a fundamental inaccuracy. This misconception obscures the actual metallic composition and the historical context of its production.
-
Compositional Reality
The coin, during its entire production run, consisted of 75% copper and 25% nickel. No regular issue contained silver. The erroneous description likely arose from the coin’s initial appearance, which, when newly minted, could possess a bright, silvery sheen. However, this surface luster is solely attributable to the nickel content and diminishes with circulation and environmental exposure.
-
Visual Deception
The coin’s initial visual resemblance to silver coins of the era, particularly when uncirculated, likely contributed to the misnomer. This superficial similarity led many individuals, unfamiliar with the coin’s actual composition, to mistakenly identify it as silver.
-
Impact on Value Perceptions
The inaccurate label can lead to unrealistic expectations regarding the coin’s intrinsic value. Individuals assuming the coin contains silver may overestimate its worth based on fluctuating silver prices, rather than the coin’s numismatic value, which is determined by factors such as rarity, condition, and historical significance.
-
Educational Imperative
Correcting the misnomer is crucial for accurate numismatic education. Emphasizing the true composition helps collectors, investors, and the general public develop a clear understanding of the coin’s material properties and value determinants.
Addressing and rectifying this persistent misnomer is essential for fostering accurate historical understanding and informed numismatic practices related to these coins. This clarity is vital for both seasoned collectors and those new to the field.
2. Composition
The elemental makeup of the coin commonly referred to as “silver indian head nickel” is a crucial aspect in understanding its true nature and dispelling misconceptions about its value and historical context.
-
Elemental Ratio
The coin consists of a precise combination of 75% copper and 25% nickel. This specific alloy was selected for its durability, machinability, and resistance to wear during circulation. Its composition is a key factor setting it apart from other contemporary coinage that might have included silver.
-
Absence of Silver
Despite the common misconception, no regular issue contains silver. This lack of silver is a defining characteristic, affecting both its intrinsic value (metal content) and its susceptibility to tarnishing or corrosion differently than silver coinage. Identifying the true metal composition is essential for accurate evaluation.
-
Impact on Appearance
The copper-nickel alloy imparts a distinctive color and luster to the newly minted coin. This initially bright surface can be misleading, often mistaken for silver. However, with time and exposure to environmental elements, the alloy tends to oxidize, resulting in a less lustrous and often discolored appearance.
-
Affects on Value
The absence of silver directly influences the coin’s intrinsic value. Unlike silver coins whose value can fluctuate with precious metal markets, the worth of the coin depends almost entirely on its numismatic properties, such as rarity, condition, and historical significance. Market values for circulated coins reflect collector demand rather than metal content.
Therefore, the specific copper-nickel composition of the coin is not just a technical detail; it’s a defining feature that separates it from other coinage. It’s essential knowledge for collectors and those seeking to understand the value and characteristics of this historical piece.
3. Design
The design elements of the coin mistakenly referred to as “silver indian head nickel” hold significant importance in determining its collector value and historical appeal. The obverse depicts a Native American, rendered in a somewhat romanticized style reflecting early 20th-century perceptions. This image, attributed to James Earle Fraser, is not a portrait of a specific individual but rather a composite representing various Native American tribes. The reverse initially featured an eagle perched on a bundle of arrows, but this was quickly replaced with an American bison standing on a mound. This change, implemented shortly after the coin’s initial release, resulted in two distinct varieties within the 1913 mintage, significantly impacting their respective values. The design, therefore, is intrinsically linked to the coin’s historical context and collectibility.
The initial design choice of the eagle on the reverse proved problematic due to its vulnerability to wear. Fraser’s subsequent bison design, while aesthetically pleasing, also presented challenges in striking, leading to weakly struck details, particularly on the bison’s horn. Variations in the die and striking process created further sub-varieties, such as the “three-legged buffalo” nickel, where one of the bison’s legs is missing due to over-polishing of the die. The coin’s design, combined with production difficulties, resulted in numerous identifiable varieties that numismatists actively seek. The aesthetic choices and manufacturing challenges directly contribute to the unique aspects of the coin.
In summary, the coin’s design, from the choice of imagery to the inherent production challenges, significantly affects its collector value and historical narrative. The Native American and bison motifs, while visually compelling, also introduced striking difficulties that resulted in identifiable varieties. The intersection of artistic design and manufacturing limitations contributes to the coin’s enduring appeal and numismatic significance. Understanding the design is essential for collectors seeking to identify valuable varieties and appreciate the historical context of the coinage.
4. Mint Marks
Mint marks represent a critical component in the identification and valuation of the coin often incorrectly referred to as “silver indian head nickel.” These marks, small letters indicating the mint facility where the coin was produced, directly influence a coin’s rarity and, consequently, its desirability among collectors. The presence or absence of a mint mark, as well as its specific location and style, differentiates seemingly identical coins, creating significant variations in value.
The Philadelphia Mint, lacking a mint mark, produced the largest quantities of these coins. Denver (“D”) and San Francisco (“S”) also contributed to the coin’s production, albeit in comparatively smaller numbers. Certain dates and mint mark combinations are exceptionally rare. For instance, the 1914-D coin is highly sought after due to its relatively low mintage. Conversely, a coin from a common year and mint might hold minimal value in circulated condition. The mint mark is typically located below the denomination (“FIVE CENTS”) on the reverse of the coin. Its clear identification is, therefore, crucial for accurately assessing any example.
The presence, absence, or type of mint mark provides essential information regarding the coin’s origin, production volume, and ultimately, its potential worth. Without a clear understanding of mint marks and their historical context, accurately assessing the value is fundamentally impossible. Collectors must prioritize identification to navigate this intricate aspect of the coin and the coin’s numismatic properties.
5. Key Dates
Understanding the significance of key dates is paramount for any individual seeking to appreciate the numismatic value and historical context of the coin often referred to as “silver indian head nickel”. Certain years of mintage represent significant rarities or variations, thereby commanding substantial premiums among collectors.
-
1913 Type 2 (Raised Ground)
The 1913 Type 2 coin is particularly valuable due to its design modification. The initial design placed the bison on a raised mound, which proved susceptible to wear. Mid-year, the design was altered to a recessed ground. Type 2 specimens are significantly rarer and more desirable. This design change, coupled with the low mintage figures for that year, makes it a key date.
-
1914-D
The 1914-D coin, struck at the Denver Mint, exhibits a significantly lower mintage compared to other years and mints. Its scarcity is a primary driver of its elevated value. The Denver Mint’s lower production volume during this year creates a substantial imbalance between supply and collector demand.
-
1916 Doubled Die Obverse
The 1916 Doubled Die Obverse variety exhibits a distinct doubling of the design elements on the obverse, most noticeably in the date and inscriptions. This error, resulting from a misaligned die during the striking process, makes these examples highly sought after by collectors specializing in error coins. Its unique characteristics separate it from standard issues, driving up its market price.
-
1918/7-D Overdate
The 1918/7-D overdate features a “1918” date struck over a “1917” date at the Denver Mint. This error, resulting from the reuse of a die, is a classic and highly coveted variety. The visible remnants of the underlying “7” beneath the “8” make this error easily identifiable and greatly increases its value.
The identification of these key dates provides a foundation for understanding the complexities and potential value within the broader range of coins. Recognizing these significant dates allows for a more nuanced appreciation of the coin, distinguishing common examples from those with exceptional numismatic value.
6. Varieties
The term “varieties,” in the context of the coin often mistakenly described as “silver indian head nickel,” refers to the distinct variations in design or manufacturing that differentiate individual specimens from one another. These differences, often subtle, can significantly impact a coin’s value and desirability among collectors. Understanding these varieties is essential for accurately assessing and appreciating the coin’s numismatic significance.
-
Die Varieties
Die varieties arise from alterations or errors in the dies used to strike the coins. These alterations can be intentional, such as the creation of different design elements, or unintentional, such as die cracks or repunched mint marks. A notable example is the 1918/7-D overdate, where the die for 1918 was struck over a 1917 die, resulting in remnants of the ‘7’ being visible. Such die varieties are highly sought after by collectors. These varieties are key to understanding the minting process of the coin.
-
Repunched Mint Marks (RPMs)
Repunched Mint Marks (RPMs) occur when the mint mark is punched into the working die more than once, often with slight misalignments. This can result in a doubled or tripled appearance of the mint mark. The presence of an RPM can substantially increase the coin’s value. This variety highlights the manual processes involved in early 20th-century coin production, which would increase the coin’s intrinsic value.
-
Error Varieties
Error varieties stem from mistakes during the minting process. Examples include off-center strikes, where the design is not fully imprinted on the planchet, or brockage errors, where an image of a coin is impressed onto another coin during striking. One of the most famous is the 1937-D “Three-Legged Buffalo” variety. These errors are uncommon and appeal to collectors specializing in minting mistakes.
-
Design Modifications
Design modifications refer to deliberate changes made to the coin’s design during its production run. The most prominent example is the change in the ground beneath the bison in 1913, resulting in the Type 1 (bison on mound) and Type 2 (bison on a plain). These design modifications, while not errors, create distinct varieties that are essential for collectors to recognize.
In conclusion, understanding the different “varieties” associated with the coin commonly referred to as “silver indian head nickel” is crucial for its accurate identification and valuation. From die errors and repunched mint marks to significant design modifications, these variations offer insight into the coin’s production process and history, thereby enhancing its appeal to numismatists. Examining these varieties enables collectors to differentiate between common and rare specimens, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of this historically significant coin.
7. Grading
The meticulous process of grading assumes paramount importance in determining the value and collectibility of the coin often misidentified as “silver indian head nickel.” Grading, performed by expert numismatists, involves evaluating a coin’s physical condition, focusing on factors such as surface preservation, strike quality, and the absence of defects. This assessment results in an assigned grade, ranging from Poor (PR) to Mint State (MS), providing a standardized measure of the coin’s condition. A coin in higher grade commands a significantly higher premium than a comparable example in lower grade. For instance, a 1913-S Type 2 in MS-65 condition might be worth thousands of dollars, while the same date and type in Good (G) condition may only fetch a few dollars. The assigned grade directly impacts the perceived value and thus influences purchasing decisions.
Professional grading services, such as the Professional Coin Grading Service (PCGS) and the Numismatic Guaranty Corporation (NGC), provide unbiased assessments, encapsulating the graded coin in a tamper-evident holder. This encapsulation safeguards the coin and provides assurance to potential buyers regarding its authenticity and assigned grade. The process of grading and encapsulation reduces the risk of subjective evaluation, establishing a more transparent and reliable marketplace. Furthermore, certain key dates and varieties are particularly sensitive to grading nuances. Weak strikes, common in this series, can substantially lower a coin’s grade, emphasizing the importance of strike quality in the overall assessment.
In summary, grading serves as a cornerstone in the accurate assessment and valuation of these coins. The assigned grade, determined by expert analysis and standardized scales, directly correlates with a coin’s market value, influencing collector and investor decisions. The use of reputable grading services enhances transparency and mitigates subjective bias, fostering confidence within the numismatic community. Therefore, a thorough understanding of grading principles and the characteristics impacting a coin’s grade is essential for anyone engaging with this iconic piece of American coinage.
8. Preservation
The preservation of these coins, often referred to as “silver indian head nickel,” is crucial for maintaining their numismatic value and historical integrity. These coins, composed of a copper-nickel alloy, are susceptible to environmental factors that can cause deterioration, including oxidation, corrosion, and physical damage. Improper storage or handling accelerates these processes, diminishing both the aesthetic appeal and market value. Therefore, appropriate preservation techniques are essential for ensuring the longevity and continued appreciation of these artifacts.
Specific methods of preservation include proper storage in inert, archival-quality holders or albums designed for coin collecting. These materials minimize exposure to air, moisture, and contaminants. Routine handling should be minimized, and when necessary, coins should be held by their edges to avoid transferring oils and dirt from the hands. Cleaning the coins is generally discouraged, as it can easily result in irreversible damage, especially the alteration of their original surfaces. In cases of severe contamination, professional conservation services should be consulted to undertake minimally invasive cleaning procedures. Ignoring these measures can lead to significant degradation, transforming a potentially valuable coin into a less desirable or even worthless example.
In summary, the careful preservation represents a fundamental aspect of responsible coin collecting. The impact of environmental factors on these copper-nickel alloy coins necessitates proactive steps to prevent deterioration. Understanding and implementing appropriate storage, handling, and cleaning techniques ensures the long-term preservation of these historical artifacts. By prioritizing preservation, collectors contribute to safeguarding the numismatic and historical value of these coins for future generations.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Coins Often Called “Silver Indian Head Nickel”
This section addresses common inquiries and dispels misconceptions about these United States five-cent pieces. Information is presented in a factual and concise manner.
Question 1: Is the coin actually made of silver?
No, despite the common misnomer, the coin contains no silver. Its composition consists of 75% copper and 25% nickel.
Question 2: What factors determine its value?
A coin’s value depends on its rarity (determined by date and mint mark), condition (as graded by professional services), and the presence of any recognized varieties or errors.
Question 3: Where can the mint mark be found?
The mint mark, if present, is located on the reverse (back) of the coin, directly below the words “FIVE CENTS”. The absence of a mint mark indicates that the coin was struck at the Philadelphia Mint.
Question 4: How should this coin be stored?
These coins should be stored in archival-quality holders or albums designed for coin collecting to minimize exposure to environmental contaminants. Direct handling should be avoided.
Question 5: Is it advisable to clean a coin?
Cleaning is generally discouraged, as it can damage the coin’s surface and diminish its value. Professional conservation services should be consulted in cases of severe contamination.
Question 6: What are some key dates or varieties to look for?
Notable examples include the 1913 Type 2 (bison on a plain), the 1914-D, and the 1937-D “Three-Legged Buffalo”. These dates and varieties are highly valued by collectors.
Understanding these points aids in the informed collecting and preservation of this coinage. Accurate knowledge of composition, valuation, and preservation practices is essential.
The following section provides resources for further study and exploration of numismatic topics related to these coins.
Collecting Insights
This section provides concise guidelines for individuals interested in collecting these coins, addressing key considerations for acquisition and preservation.
Tip 1: Prioritize Authenticity Verification: Prior to acquiring any specimen, ensure its authenticity. Counterfeit examples exist and can be deceptively similar to genuine coins. Engage reputable dealers or utilize authentication services to confirm legitimacy.
Tip 2: Focus on High-Grade Examples: When feasible, prioritize coins in higher grades (e.g., MS-60 or above). Well-preserved coins possess greater aesthetic appeal and typically appreciate more significantly in value over time.
Tip 3: Research Mint Marks and Key Dates: Thoroughly research the rarities associated with different mint marks (D, S) and key dates (e.g., 1913-S Type 2, 1914-D). Understanding relative scarcity informs acquisition strategies and prevents overpayment.
Tip 4: Avoid Aggressive Cleaning Methods: Refrain from using abrasive cleaning agents or techniques. Such methods can irreparably damage the coin’s surface, reducing its grade and value. Gentle handling and proper storage are preferred.
Tip 5: Secure Professional Grading: Consider submitting valuable specimens to reputable grading services (PCGS, NGC). Professional grading provides an unbiased assessment of condition and enhances the coin’s marketability.
Tip 6: Research Notable Varieties: Study the identifying characteristics of recognized die varieties (e.g., 1916 Doubled Die Obverse, 1918/7-D Overdate). These varieties command premiums among specialist collectors.
Tip 7: Develop a Defined Collecting Strategy: Establish clear objectives for the collection, whether focusing on a complete date set, mint mark variations, or high-grade examples. A defined strategy provides direction and prevents unfocused accumulation.
Implementing these strategies optimizes collecting practices and promotes the long-term value and enjoyment associated with these historically significant coins.
The next and final section offers concluding thoughts and a summary of key information presented throughout the article.
Conclusion
The exploration of the coin, often misidentified as “silver indian head nickel,” reveals a complex interplay of historical context, manufacturing variations, and numismatic value. Its composition of copper and nickel, the distinctive design featuring a Native American and an American bison, and the presence of mint marks and notable varieties contribute to its enduring appeal among collectors. Understanding key dates, grading standards, and proper preservation techniques is essential for appreciating its significance. The persistent misnomer highlights the importance of accurate information dissemination within the numismatic community.
Ultimately, the study underscores the need for informed collecting practices and a nuanced appreciation of numismatic history. Further research and engagement with expert resources will continue to enrich our understanding of this historically significant coinage. The insights gained contribute to the preservation of these artifacts for future generations.
