Identifying features found on silver items produced by a particular manufacturer, specifically a series of symbols, letters, or words applied to pieces created by a company called Rogers, Smith & Co., serves as a crucial aspect of assessing their origin, age, and authenticity. These stamps provide a way to trace the item’s provenance and understand its place within the manufacturer’s production history. For example, a particular combination of an anchor symbol, the initials “R.S.&Co.”, and a date code may indicate a specific production period for a silver-plated serving dish.
The presence and condition of these maker’s marks are vital for both collectors and historians. These identifiers provide a means of distinguishing genuine articles from reproductions or items made by other manufacturers. Careful examination of these features, often requiring magnification, allows for accurate appraisal and helps in determining an item’s potential value and significance. Furthermore, studying patterns in these identifiers can reveal information about the company’s manufacturing techniques, stylistic evolution, and market strategies over time.
Understanding these manufacturer’s identifiers is foundational to researching and appreciating the historical context of antique silverware. The following discussion will delve deeper into specific examples, resources for identification, and methods for dating pieces based on their imprinted or engraved features.
1. Manufacturer Identification
The process of attributing silver items to their original producer is a fundamental aspect of silver analysis. For pieces originating from Rogers, Smith & Co., specific markings serve as the primary means of establishing their source. These identifiers, beyond simply indicating the maker, provide essential information about the company’s operations and the historical context in which these items were crafted.
-
Trademark Recognition
Rogers, Smith & Co. employed a variety of trademarks throughout its operational period. These can include initials, full company names, and distinct pictorial symbols. Recognizing these individual marks, and understanding their chronological usage, is crucial. Misinterpretation could lead to attributing a piece to the wrong manufacturer, affecting its perceived value and historical accuracy. For example, identifying the use of an eagle symbol specific to a certain period allows for more precise dating.
-
Pattern Number Decipherment
Beyond trademarks, many silver items bear pattern numbers. These numeric or alphanumeric codes correspond to specific designs or product lines. Cataloging these numbers and associating them with Rogers, Smith & Co. patterns enables the accurate identification of pieces, even when trademarks are worn or incomplete. The presence of a specific pattern number, cross-referenced with historical catalogs, can confirm the origin of a silver tea set, for example.
-
Subsidiary and Acquisition Markings
Rogers, Smith & Co. underwent periods of acquisition and operated as a subsidiary of larger entities, particularly during its later years. Markings from these periods often reflect this association, incorporating the parent company’s name or logo alongside those of Rogers, Smith & Co. Failing to recognize these secondary identifiers can lead to misattribution. Pieces marked with “International Silver Co.” alongside the company’s identifier, demonstrate this relationship.
-
Absence of Markings and Potential Pitfalls
It is important to note that not all silver items from Rogers, Smith & Co. are clearly marked. Wear, polishing, or manufacturing flaws can obscure or remove markings entirely. A lack of a clear identifier does not automatically negate the possibility of authentic origin; however, it necessitates relying on stylistic analysis and comparisons with documented examples. The complete absence of any potential maker’s features requires cautious assessment.
The ability to accurately identify items produced by Rogers, Smith & Co. hinges upon a thorough understanding of their diverse markings and the historical context surrounding their usage. This knowledge is fundamental for collectors, historians, and appraisers seeking to authenticate, date, and value these pieces, contributing to a broader understanding of silver manufacturing in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Correct interpretations relies on cross-referencing diverse types of markers.
2. Dating Pieces
Establishing the age of silver items from Rogers, Smith & Co. is a critical process, facilitated primarily by the analysis of their maker’s marks. These identifiers, when interpreted correctly, offer insights into the specific periods during which items were manufactured. Accurate dating enhances historical understanding and informs valuation assessments.
-
Trademark Evolution
Rogers, Smith & Co. utilized evolving trademarks throughout its history. Changes in font styles, the inclusion or exclusion of certain symbols (e.g., an eagle, a star), and variations in the arrangement of initials provide chronological clues. By comparing a mark on a silver item with documented timelines of trademark usage, a date range for production can be established. For example, if a piece bears a mark featuring the full company name “Rogers, Smith & Co.” without “International Silver Co.,” it likely predates the company’s acquisition, providing a boundary for its creation date.
-
Patent and Design Registration Dates
Many Rogers, Smith & Co. silver designs were patented or registered, and these dates are sometimes incorporated into the maker’s marks or stamped separately on the item. The presence of a patent date establishes a terminus post quem a date after which the item could not have been made. It’s crucial to note that the patent date might not directly correspond to the manufacturing date if the design remained in production for several years. Observing a patent date of 1875 on a silver tea set indicates that it cannot have been manufactured before that year but could have been produced anytime afterward.
-
Style and Pattern Analysis
The style of silverware evolved over time, reflecting broader trends in design and fashion. By analyzing the aesthetic characteristics of a Rogers, Smith & Co. piece its ornamentation, shape, and overall design a relative date can be estimated based on known stylistic periods. For example, a highly ornate, Victorian-era design suggests a production period in the late 19th century, whereas a simpler, more streamlined design may indicate a later date in the early 20th century. This stylistic dating is most effective when combined with other evidence, such as trademark analysis.
-
Catalogue and Advertisement Comparison
Historical catalogues and advertisements from Rogers, Smith & Co. often showcase specific patterns and designs that were popular during particular years. Comparing the marks and patterns of a silver item with these documented records enables a precise dating. If a specific pattern is featured in a catalogue from 1888, and the item bears the same pattern number, it lends strong support to a production date around that year. However, one should note the possibility of patterns being reissued in later years, requiring careful consideration.
The accurate dating of Rogers, Smith & Co. silver pieces requires a multifaceted approach, integrating trademark analysis, patent date examination, stylistic considerations, and catalogue comparisons. By combining these methods, a robust and reliable estimate of the item’s age can be achieved, providing valuable information for collectors, researchers, and appraisers. This understanding enriches the appreciation and value assessment of these historical artifacts.
3. Authenticity Verification
The presence of specific identifiers is fundamental to establishing the genuine nature of silver pieces attributed to Rogers, Smith & Co. These identifiers, encompassing trademarks, pattern numbers, and subsidiary markings, represent the primary means of distinguishing authentic products from imitations or pieces manufactured by other companies. A piece lacking verifiable features raises immediate concerns about its origin. The absence of a registered trademark, for example, creates reasonable doubt regarding its legitimacy, necessitating further scrutiny. This initial validation is a critical first step in appraisal and historical assessment.
Detailed examination of the maker’s marks involves more than simply confirming their presence. Careful attention must be paid to their clarity, placement, and conformity to known examples. The application technique, whether stamped, engraved, or etched, also offers insight. A poorly executed or suspiciously placed symbol can be indicative of a counterfeit. Furthermore, the materials and manufacturing techniques employed in the piece itself must align with the established practices of Rogers, Smith & Co. during the purported period of production. Discrepancies in the silver content, weight, or construction methods can further undermine the authenticity of the item. For example, a silver-plated piece with a maker’s mark claiming sterling silver composition would be immediately suspect.
Authenticity verification, therefore, requires a comprehensive approach, combining meticulous inspection of the identifiers, analysis of material and construction, and comparison with documented examples from reputable sources. Although these signs provide invaluable guidance, challenges remain. Wear, polishing, and deliberate alteration can obscure or distort these symbols. Furthermore, the existence of well-executed forgeries necessitates ongoing vigilance and expertise. Accurate authentication ultimately depends on a deep understanding of Rogers, Smith & Co.’s history, manufacturing processes, and identifying patterns, ensuring the integrity of collections and market transactions.
4. Silverplate Composition
The underlying metallic composition of articles bearing Rogers, Smith & Co. hallmarks is paramount to understanding their value and proper care. As a manufacturer primarily known for silver-plated wares, the nature of this plating significantly influences both the longevity and market worth of their pieces. Knowledge of the base metal and the plating process is thus intertwined with the interpretation of their identifying marks.
-
Base Metal Identification
Rogers, Smith & Co. utilized various base metals, including Britannia metal, nickel silver (also known as German silver), and copper alloys, as substrates for their silver plating. The choice of base metal influenced the durability and corrosion resistance of the final product. For example, items made with a Britannia metal base might exhibit a different type of wear compared to those with a copper alloy base, even when both bear identical hallmarks.
-
Plating Thickness and Quality
The thickness and quality of the silver plating directly impacted the longevity and aesthetic appeal of the item. Heavier plating provided greater resistance to wear and tarnishing. Rogers, Smith & Co. sometimes indicated the plating quality through additional marks or symbols incorporated into their hallmarks. A triple-plated item, for instance, would exhibit significantly greater wear resistance than a single-plated piece.
-
Wear Patterns and Underlying Metals
Over time, the silver plating inevitably wears away, revealing the underlying base metal. The nature and location of these wear patterns can provide clues about the item’s age, usage, and the original plating quality. Observation of reddish tones indicates a copper alloy base, while a dull gray appearance suggests Britannia metal. Analysis of wear patterns, in conjunction with Rogers, Smith & Co. hallmarks, aids in determining the item’s historical context.
-
Hallmark Implications on Value
The composition of the piece directly impacts the value. While hallmarks authenticate the manufacturer, they do not guarantee solid silver. Silver-plated items command a lower market price compared to their solid silver counterparts. Accurately determining the composition is essential for proper appraisal. A Rogers, Smith & Co. hallmark on a piece identified as silver-plated will result in a valuation reflecting its true composition, rather than that of a solid silver artifact.
Therefore, the silverplate composition represents a core factor in determining a Rogers, Smith & Co. item’s value, longevity, and appropriate care. It needs to be considered alongside the hallmarks and manufacturing style for a comprehensive appraisal.
5. Symbol Variations
Symbol variations within the realm of Rogers, Smith & Co. silver marks constitute a critical element for accurate identification and dating. The company employed a range of symbolic representations in conjunction with their name or initials to denote periods of production, specific product lines, or even the quality of plating. These symbols evolved over time, resulting in distinct variations that serve as chronological markers. For example, early marks might feature a specific eagle design that later evolved into a more stylized or simplified version. Understanding these subtle shifts is essential because misinterpreting a symbol can lead to inaccurate dating, affecting provenance and value assessments. The presence of a specific star configuration, paired with an anchor emblem, might indicate a particular production period between 1860 and 1870, as documented in historical trade catalogs. These subtle but impactful shifts underscore the importance of detailed observation.
Furthermore, the placement and size of these symbols, relative to the textual components of the mark, also vary. In some instances, the symbol might be prominently displayed, while in others it is relegated to a smaller, less conspicuous position. These variations are not arbitrary; they often correlate with specific manufacturing processes or product grades. The consistent appearance of a large, bold eagle alongside the company name on presentation pieces, compared to smaller versions on everyday tableware, provides a tangible example. Variations also extended to the inclusion or omission of certain symbols altogether, reflecting changes in company ownership, manufacturing processes, or market strategy. Pieces produced after the acquisition by International Silver Company frequently exhibit different symbolic combinations, incorporating the parent company’s emblem.
The study of symbol variations associated with Rogers, Smith & Co. silver marks is not merely an academic exercise; it has practical implications for collectors, dealers, and historians. Accurate identification and dating depend on a thorough understanding of these subtle differences. Ignoring these variations can lead to misattribution, potentially overvaluing or undervaluing artifacts. By carefully documenting and analyzing these variations, one can more accurately trace the history and evolution of the company’s products, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of American silver manufacturing in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
6. Pattern Recognition
The systematic identification of recurring designs and motifs on silverware is crucial for accurately attributing pieces to specific manufacturers. The ability to discern these characteristic elements, a process known as pattern recognition, is particularly vital when dealing with Rogers, Smith & Co. items. These skills provide the means for verifying authenticity, estimating age, and understanding historical context.
-
Design Motif Identification
Rogers, Smith & Co. produced silverware featuring a variety of decorative motifs, ranging from floral arrangements to geometric designs and neoclassical elements. Recognizing these recurring themes within their body of work allows for more confident attribution. For instance, the frequent use of a particular stylized rose or a specific repeating geometric border pattern can serve as indicators of Rogers, Smith & Co. production. Discerning these design elements is fundamental in separating genuine articles from imitations.
-
Handle and Body Shape Consistency
Beyond surface decoration, consistent patterns in the shapes of handles, bowls, and other structural elements offer valuable clues. Analyzing the curvature of a spoon handle, the profile of a teapot spout, or the overall silhouette of a serving dish provides a means of comparison against known examples. Rogers, Smith & Co. often adhered to specific design conventions for particular product lines. Deviations from these established norms can raise questions about authenticity or suggest a different manufacturer.
-
Engraving Style Analysis
The style of engraving employed on Rogers, Smith & Co. silverware exhibits recognizable patterns. The depth, precision, and aesthetic character of engraved monograms, inscriptions, and decorative flourishes can be compared against authenticated examples to verify origin. The unique hand of the engraver, or the specific techniques used during a particular period, can offer additional insights. Subtle differences in the execution of these elements can suggest a piece originated from a different source or was later altered.
-
Numerical and Alphanumeric Codes
Rogers, Smith & Co. frequently employed numerical and alphanumeric codes to identify specific patterns or production series. Recognizing and decoding these identifiers is essential for matching pieces within a set or confirming their authenticity. These codes, often stamped discreetly on the underside of an item, provide a direct link to historical catalogs and manufacturing records. The ability to interpret these codes allows researchers and collectors to trace the provenance of a piece and establish its place within the company’s overall production history.
By mastering these aspects of pattern recognition, individuals can more effectively analyze Rogers, Smith & Co. silver marks and the silverware bearing those marks. The skillful application of these techniques leads to more accurate attributions, more reliable valuations, and a deeper appreciation of the company’s contribution to the history of American silverware manufacturing. This expertise extends beyond merely identifying designs; it encompasses an understanding of the context and history of each unique pattern.
7. Value Assessment
Value assessment, in the context of silver pieces, relies heavily on the accurate interpretation of maker’s marks. For items bearing Rogers, Smith & Co. hallmarks, the analysis of these identifying features is paramount in determining monetary worth. This process involves more than simply acknowledging the existence of a mark; it requires a nuanced understanding of its variations, context, and implications.
-
Hallmark Authenticity and Condition
The first determinant of value lies in the authentication of the Rogers, Smith & Co. mark itself. A clear, well-defined mark that conforms to known examples significantly increases an item’s value. Conversely, a damaged, incomplete, or suspect mark diminishes worth. For instance, a silver tea service with pristine hallmarks will command a higher price than one with heavily worn or partially obscured identifiers. The absence of a recognizable mark renders attribution problematic, substantially reducing potential sale value.
-
Rarity and Production Period
The scarcity of a particular Rogers, Smith & Co. pattern, coupled with the specific period in which it was produced, influences value considerably. Items manufactured during periods of high craftsmanship or those representing limited production runs are more desirable to collectors. For example, a serving piece from a short-lived or experimental design series will fetch a higher price than a common, mass-produced item from the same manufacturer. Identifying these rare pieces relies on in-depth knowledge of the company’s history and output.
-
Material Composition and Plating Quality
The underlying metal composition and the quality of silver plating directly impact value. While Rogers, Smith & Co. primarily produced silver-plated wares, variations in the thickness and durability of the plating affect the item’s longevity and desirability. A piece with heavier plating exhibiting minimal wear will be valued higher than one with thin, worn plating revealing the base metal. Furthermore, any indication of solid silver construction (though rare for this manufacturer) would dramatically increase its worth.
-
Historical Significance and Provenance
An item’s historical significance, tied to documented ownership or connection to notable events, enhances value. Clear provenance, supported by verifiable records or documentation, adds a premium. For instance, a Rogers, Smith & Co. serving tray known to have been used at a historic event or owned by a prominent family would be more valuable than an identical tray lacking such provenance. Establishing this historical link requires diligent research and authentication of supporting documentation.
These factors, intrinsically linked to the interpretation of Rogers, Smith & Co. silver marks, collectively determine the value of an item. An accurate assessment demands expertise in hallmark identification, historical context, and material analysis. The interplay of these elements dictates the perceived worth and market price, thereby emphasizing the importance of understanding the nuances of the manufacturer’s identifying features.
8. Rarity Indicators
The presence of distinct maker’s marks on silver pieces, particularly those produced by Rogers, Smith & Co., offers crucial information for establishing scarcity. Certain marks, or combinations thereof, can signal limited production runs, specific historical periods, or unique design collaborations, consequently influencing the artifact’s desirability and value.
-
Limited Production Marks
Rogers, Smith & Co. occasionally utilized specific symbols or alphanumeric codes within their identifying marks to denote items produced in limited quantities. These marks, often documented in company records or historical catalogs, serve as direct indicators of rarity. The presence of such a code, cross-referenced with available production figures, can confirm the scarcity of a particular design or pattern. The relative lack of documented examples bearing this symbol in the market further reinforces this assessment of limited availability.
-
Short-Lived Pattern Identifiers
Some identifying marks are associated with patterns that were only produced for a brief period due to shifts in market demand, manufacturing challenges, or design obsolescence. Consequently, items bearing these identifiers are less common than those from more popular or long-running lines. Recognizing these short-lived pattern identifiers requires a deep understanding of Rogers, Smith & Co.’s production history and the ability to correlate marks with specific design cycles. The infrequent appearance of these patterns in auction records or antique inventories suggests their relative scarcity.
-
Special Commission Marks
On occasion, Rogers, Smith & Co. produced pieces as special commissions for specific clients or events. These items often bear unique marks or inscriptions that distinguish them from standard production pieces. The presence of a crest, monogram, or inscription integrated into the maker’s mark indicates a custom order, suggesting a limited production run tailored to the client’s specifications. Such commissioned pieces are inherently rarer due to their individualized nature and limited distribution.
-
Mark Variations Due to Manufacturing Changes
Alterations in manufacturing processes, such as shifts in plating techniques or the introduction of new machinery, sometimes resulted in variations in the application or appearance of Rogers, Smith & Co.’s identifying marks. These subtle differences, discernible upon close examination, can signal a specific period of transition or experimentation, indicating a limited number of items produced with that particular mark variation. The ability to recognize these subtle shifts requires a keen eye and a thorough understanding of the company’s evolving production methods.
These multifaceted rarity indicators, when analyzed in conjunction with Rogers, Smith & Co. silver marks, offer a comprehensive understanding of an item’s scarcity and potential value. Discerning these subtle variations requires a deep knowledge of the company’s history, manufacturing practices, and the nuances of their identifying marks. The ability to identify and interpret these indicators is essential for collectors, appraisers, and historians seeking to accurately assess the significance and worth of these historical artifacts.
9. Historical Context
Rogers, Smith & Co. silver marks are inextricably linked to the historical context of 19th and early 20th-century American silver manufacturing. Understanding this context is crucial for accurate interpretation of the marks themselves, as manufacturing practices, economic conditions, and prevailing design trends significantly influenced the types of marks used and the styles of silverware produced. For instance, the company’s early success was tied to the rise of industrialization and the increasing demand for affordable, silver-plated goods. This period saw the adoption of specific markings designed to appeal to a burgeoning middle class, signifying quality and refinement without the cost of solid silver. Recognizing this connection explains the prevalence of specific plating hallmarks during certain eras.
The economic landscape also played a pivotal role. During periods of economic prosperity, Rogers, Smith & Co. introduced more elaborate designs and higher-quality plating, reflected in changes to their maker’s marks. Conversely, economic downturns might have led to simplified designs and reduced plating thickness, impacting the identifiers used. The company’s absorption into the International Silver Company in 1869 represents another critical historical event. After this acquisition, Rogers, Smith & Co. marks often incorporated the parent company’s logo, signifying a shift in ownership and production strategy. The absence or presence of the “International Silver Co.” mark, therefore, serves as a crucial historical indicator for dating pieces.
In summary, interpreting Rogers, Smith & Co. silver marks requires situating them within their appropriate historical milieu. The marks reflect the evolving business strategies, economic forces, and design aesthetics of their time. Ignoring this broader context can lead to misinterpretations and inaccurate valuations. Integrating historical understanding allows for a more complete and accurate assessment of these artifacts, connecting the tangible object to its place in American manufacturing history. Future analysis should focus on correlating mark variations with specific historical events to create a more detailed timeline of production practices.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions address common inquiries and misconceptions regarding identification and interpretation of hallmarks on silver produced by Rogers, Smith & Co.
Question 1: What constitutes a genuine Rogers, Smith & Co. silver mark?
A genuine mark typically includes the company name, initials (“R.S.&Co.”), or a recognizable symbol, such as an eagle or anchor, stamped or engraved onto the piece. Variations exist depending on the period of production and product line. Cross-referencing marks with documented examples from reputable sources is crucial for verification.
Question 2: Can the presence of a Rogers, Smith & Co. silver mark guarantee that an item is solid silver?
No. Rogers, Smith & Co. was primarily known for producing silver-plated wares. The presence of the mark confirms the manufacturer but does not indicate solid silver composition. Additional markings, such as “sterling” or “925,” would be necessary to confirm solid silver content.
Question 3: How does one date a Rogers, Smith & Co. silver piece using its mark?
Dating is accomplished by analyzing the evolution of the company’s trademarks and symbols. Comparing the mark on a piece to documented timelines of trademark usage provides a date range. Patent dates, if present, offer a “terminus post quem” (earliest possible date) for production. Stylistic analysis can further refine the estimated age.
Question 4: What factors influence the value of Rogers, Smith & Co. silver-plated items?
Value is influenced by several factors, including the authenticity and condition of the mark, the rarity of the pattern, the quality and thickness of the silver plating, the item’s historical significance, and its overall condition. Items with well-defined marks, rare patterns, and minimal wear generally command higher prices.
Question 5: How can one distinguish between an original Rogers, Smith & Co. piece and a reproduction or forgery?
Distinguishing originals from reproductions requires careful examination of the mark’s details, the quality of craftsmanship, and the materials used. Suspect features include poorly executed marks, inconsistencies in design, and discrepancies in weight or metal composition. Consulting with a qualified appraiser is recommended for uncertain cases.
Question 6: Where can one find reliable information and resources for identifying Rogers, Smith & Co. silver marks?
Reliable resources include historical silver catalogs, books on antique silverware, online databases of maker’s marks, and expert appraisers specializing in silver. Reputable auction houses and museums with silver collections also offer valuable insights. Caution is advised when using online sources, verifying information against multiple reliable sources.
Accurate identification of these hallmarks is a cornerstone of properly valuing these pieces.
The next section will delve into the resources available for further research.
Tips for Evaluating Rogers, Smith & Co. Silver Marks
Effective evaluation of maker’s marks requires a systematic approach. The following tips aim to facilitate a more accurate and informed assessment, mitigating common errors in identification and appraisal.
Tip 1: Utilize Magnification: Employ a jeweler’s loupe or magnifying glass (10x or greater) to examine hallmarks closely. Subtle details, such as variations in font or the presence of minute design elements, are often overlooked without magnification. Microscopic analysis can reveal alterations or imperfections indicative of forgeries.
Tip 2: Consult Multiple Resources: Relying on a single source for mark identification is imprudent. Cross-reference marks with various published guides, online databases, and auction catalogs. Discrepancies between sources warrant further investigation.
Tip 3: Document Findings: Maintain a detailed record of each hallmark examined, including photographs, dimensions, and any unique characteristics. This documentation facilitates future comparison and validation, especially when evaluating multiple pieces.
Tip 4: Analyze Wear Patterns: Examine wear patterns on the piece, paying attention to areas around the hallmark. Excessive wear or polishing can obscure details, making accurate identification difficult. Worn marks should be compared against examples in similar condition.
Tip 5: Research Historical Context: Familiarize with the historical context of Rogers, Smith & Co., including periods of ownership changes, design trends, and economic conditions. This understanding aids in dating pieces and interpreting variations in hallmarks.
Tip 6: Assess Metal Composition: Verify the metal composition of the piece. While Rogers, Smith & Co. primarily produced silver-plated items, knowing the base metal (e.g., Britannia metal, nickel silver) aids in authentication and valuation. Chemical testing, when appropriate, can confirm metal content.
These recommendations are designed to refine identification methods and promote more reliable judgments of artifacts.
The subsequent section will summarize the primary conclusions and recommendations from this examination of the company’s silver marks.
Conclusion
The detailed analysis of Rogers, Smith & Co. silver marks reveals the importance of a comprehensive approach to authentication, dating, and valuation. Accurate interpretation hinges on understanding the interplay between trademark evolution, pattern recognition, material composition, and historical context. Failure to consider these elements can result in misattribution and inaccurate appraisal. A commitment to rigorous examination and cross-referencing with reliable resources is paramount.
The study of these historical identifiers contributes to a broader understanding of American silver manufacturing and the evolving tastes of consumers during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Continued research and documentation are essential to preserving this knowledge for future generations, ensuring the accurate identification and appreciation of these artifacts. Further exploration into regional distribution patterns and consumer preferences are recommended.
