The alphanumeric string utilized for billing and record-keeping purposes when this specific antimicrobial liquid is applied to arrest caries is a crucial component of healthcare administration. For instance, a dental professional would use this designated string when submitting a claim to an insurance provider for reimbursement after the application of the medicament.
Accurate and consistent use of this designation is essential for proper documentation, insurance processing, and tracking of its utilization within the dental field. Correct coding ensures that dental practices receive appropriate compensation for services rendered and allows for analysis of treatment trends and effectiveness over time. Its adoption reflects a movement towards standardized procedures and improved data management in preventative dentistry.
The following sections will delve into the specific applications, clinical evidence, and practical considerations surrounding the utilization of this important cariostatic agent within a comprehensive dental treatment plan.
1. Accuracy
The precision with which the designated alphanumeric code is applied significantly impacts the financial and legal integrity of dental practices utilizing silver diamine fluoride (SDF). Inaccurate coding can lead to a cascade of negative consequences, undermining the intended benefits of standardized coding practices.
-
Financial Repercussions
Incorrectly assigning a code related to SDF application can result in claim denials from insurance providers. If a more complex or higher-paying procedure code is mistakenly used, it could be flagged as fraudulent activity, leading to audits and potential legal ramifications. Conversely, using a code that underestimates the service provided results in under-reimbursement, directly impacting practice revenue.
-
Data Integrity and Analysis
The accuracy of coding directly affects the reliability of data used for epidemiological studies and public health initiatives. If application of the SDF is improperly coded, it skews the statistics regarding its usage, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. This, in turn, hinders informed decision-making by policymakers, researchers, and clinicians relying on this data.
-
Compliance and Legal Liability
Dental practices are legally obligated to maintain accurate records of services rendered. Consistent miscoding, even if unintentional, can be construed as a violation of billing regulations and potentially trigger legal action. Furthermore, accurate coding is vital for complying with insurance contracts, ensuring practices are reimbursed appropriately and within the terms of their agreements.
-
Patient Transparency and Trust
Accurate coding contributes to transparency in patient billing. When patients receive clear and correct explanations of the codes used for their treatment, it fosters trust in the practice. Conversely, errors or inconsistencies in coding can lead to patient confusion, dissatisfaction, and potentially damage the patient-dentist relationship.
The presented facets highlight the critical importance of precision in assigning codes for SDF application. It transcends simple clerical tasks; it is the foundation for financial stability, compliance, data integrity, and patient trust within dental practices. A commitment to accuracy ensures that the benefits of standardized coding practices are fully realized, promoting transparency, efficiency, and ethical conduct within the dental profession.
2. Reimbursement
Successful financial remuneration for the application of silver diamine fluoride hinges directly on the precise and appropriate selection of its corresponding code. Without accurate coding, claims are likely to be rejected, leading to financial losses for dental practices.
-
Code Specificity and Payer Policies
Different insurance providers, both private and governmental, establish specific policies regarding the reimbursement of dental procedures. These policies often dictate the precise code that must be used for a service to be covered. Using a code that is not recognized or approved by the payer will invariably result in claim denial. For example, if a payer requires a specific code for “caries arresting medicament application,” but a more general preventative code is used, the claim will be rejected. Familiarity with individual payer policies is essential for maximizing reimbursement success.
-
Documentation Requirements and Justification
Even when the correct code is selected, adequate documentation is crucial for supporting the claim and justifying the necessity of the procedure. Insurance providers may request detailed clinical notes, radiographs, or other evidence to verify that the application of silver diamine fluoride was medically indicated and performed according to established protocols. Failure to provide sufficient documentation will result in claim denial, regardless of code accuracy. An example includes documenting the presence of active caries lesions in a child patient with limited cooperation.
-
Bundling and Unbundling Rules
Insurance companies often have rules about which procedures can be billed together (bundled) and which must be billed separately (unbundled). The code for silver diamine fluoride application may be subject to these rules. For example, it might be bundled with a comprehensive oral evaluation if performed on the same day. Understanding these rules is critical for avoiding claim denials due to improper billing practices. Incorrectly unbundling services could lead to accusations of fraudulent billing.
-
Code Updates and Compliance
Dental codes are subject to periodic revisions and updates. It is imperative that dental practices stay informed about these changes and ensure their billing systems are updated accordingly. Using an outdated or deleted code for silver diamine fluoride application will certainly result in rejection. Furthermore, practices must adhere to all applicable regulations and guidelines related to coding and billing practices to maintain compliance and prevent audits or penalties. Regular training and education on coding updates are essential.
In summary, securing adequate reimbursement for silver diamine fluoride application is a multi-faceted process that requires attention to detail, thorough documentation, and ongoing education. Accurate coding is only the first step; a comprehensive understanding of payer policies, bundling rules, and compliance requirements is essential for navigating the complexities of dental insurance billing and ensuring proper financial compensation for services rendered.
3. Documentation
Comprehensive and meticulous documentation is paramount when utilizing the specific code associated with silver diamine fluoride application. It establishes a clear, defensible record of the patient’s condition, the rationale for treatment, and the details of the procedure itself. Without adequate documentation, reimbursement claims are vulnerable, and the quality of patient care can be compromised.
-
Justification for Use
Documentation must clearly articulate the medical necessity for silver diamine fluoride application. This includes detailing the presence and severity of active caries lesions, the patient’s age and cooperation level, and any relevant medical or behavioral considerations that influenced the treatment decision. For example, in the case of a young child with extensive early childhood caries and difficulty tolerating traditional restorative procedures, the clinical notes should explicitly state these factors as reasons for selecting silver diamine fluoride as the appropriate intervention. Failure to provide this justification can lead to claims denial, as payers require evidence that the treatment aligns with established clinical guidelines and best practices.
-
Procedure Details
A detailed account of the application procedure itself is essential. This includes specifying the teeth treated, the concentration of the silver diamine fluoride solution used, the method of application (e.g., microbrush, cotton pellet), and any precautions taken to protect surrounding tissues. Including photographs of the treated teeth before and after application further strengthens the documentation and provides a visual record of the treatment outcome. For instance, if silver diamine fluoride is applied to teeth #D, #E, #F with a 38% solution using a microbrush technique, this must be clearly documented in the patient’s chart. Such specificity ensures accurate record-keeping and facilitates future monitoring of treatment effectiveness.
-
Informed Consent
Evidence of informed consent is a critical element of comprehensive documentation. The patient or their legal guardian must be informed about the benefits, risks, and alternatives to silver diamine fluoride treatment, and their understanding and agreement must be documented in the patient’s record. This documentation should include the date the consent was obtained, a summary of the information provided to the patient, and the patient’s signature or a notation that verbal consent was obtained and witnessed. An example would be a signed consent form outlining the potential for staining of the treated teeth, the possibility of needing further treatment, and the option of traditional restorative procedures. Properly documented informed consent protects both the patient and the practitioner and demonstrates adherence to ethical and legal standards of care.
-
Follow-Up and Monitoring
Documentation should outline the plan for follow-up and monitoring of the treated teeth. This includes specifying the frequency of recall appointments, the methods for assessing treatment effectiveness (e.g., visual examination, radiographic evaluation), and the criteria for determining whether further intervention is needed. For example, if the treatment plan includes recall appointments every three months for visual examination and fluoride varnish application, this should be clearly stated in the patient’s record. Documenting follow-up appointments and treatment outcomes provides a comprehensive picture of the long-term effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride and allows for timely intervention if caries progression is not arrested.
By diligently adhering to these documentation principles, dental professionals can ensure accurate coding, facilitate reimbursement, and maintain the highest standards of patient care when utilizing silver diamine fluoride. Comprehensive and meticulous documentation serves as a vital safeguard, protecting both the patient and the practitioner and promoting ethical and responsible dental practice.
4. Compliance
Adherence to established regulations and guidelines is paramount in the context of code usage for silver diamine fluoride. Non-compliance can result in financial penalties, legal repercussions, and compromised patient care. Maintaining adherence safeguards the integrity of the dental practice and ensures ethical application of the therapeutic agent.
-
HIPAA Regulations
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) mandates strict protection of patient health information. Incorrect coding or improper handling of claims related to silver diamine fluoride application can lead to breaches of patient confidentiality, violating HIPAA regulations. For example, using an incorrect code that reveals sensitive diagnostic information without proper authorization constitutes a violation. Compliance necessitates secure handling of patient data and adherence to privacy rules when transmitting or storing information related to coding and billing.
-
State Dental Practice Acts
Each state has its own Dental Practice Act outlining the scope of practice for dental professionals. These acts often address coding and billing practices, including requirements for accurate and truthful documentation. Coding for silver diamine fluoride application must align with state-specific guidelines and regulations. An example would be a state mandating specific documentation requirements for the application of caries-arresting agents, including the rationale for use and the patient’s informed consent. Non-compliance with these state regulations can result in disciplinary actions, including license suspension or revocation.
-
Payer Requirements and Contracts
Dental practices enter into contracts with various insurance payers, each with its own set of rules and guidelines regarding coding and reimbursement. Failure to comply with these payer-specific requirements can lead to claim denials, audits, and potential contract termination. For example, a payer might require specific documentation of caries risk assessment prior to approving reimbursement for silver diamine fluoride application. Compliance involves thorough understanding and adherence to the contractual obligations with each payer, ensuring accurate coding and documentation that meets their specific requirements.
-
Federal Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law
The Federal Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law prohibit certain financial arrangements that could incentivize improper referrals or services. While less directly related to coding itself, the overall use and promotion of silver diamine fluoride, and consequently its associated code, must be free from any arrangements that could violate these laws. For instance, offering incentives to dental staff based on the number of silver diamine fluoride applications performed could be construed as a violation. Compliance requires careful consideration of all financial arrangements to ensure they do not violate these federal laws designed to prevent fraud and abuse in healthcare.
The interplay between compliance and the assigned code for silver diamine fluoride transcends mere adherence to technical guidelines. It encompasses a commitment to ethical practice, patient safety, and legal integrity. Ongoing education, meticulous documentation, and a robust understanding of relevant regulations are essential for navigating the complex landscape of dental coding and ensuring full compliance with all applicable laws and guidelines.
5. Specificity
The effectiveness of the code designated for silver diamine fluoride application is inherently linked to its specificity. This specificity refers to the level of detail and precision with which the code accurately represents the clinical service provided. A generalized or overly broad code fails to capture the nuances of silver diamine fluoride treatment, potentially leading to claim denials, inaccurate data collection, and compromised treatment tracking. For example, a code that simply denotes “caries treatment” without distinguishing the application of a specific medicament like silver diamine fluoride lacks the necessary specificity. This deficiency can result in difficulties in differentiating the treatment from other caries management strategies, such as traditional fillings or fluoride varnish application.
The absence of specificity can negatively affect reimbursement rates. Insurance payers rely on accurate coding to determine appropriate compensation for services. If the code lacks specificity, payers may undervalue the procedure or deny the claim altogether, as the submitted code does not accurately reflect the service rendered. Furthermore, lack of detail hinders the ability to analyze the effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride on a population level. Public health initiatives and research efforts depend on precise data to assess the impact of various treatments. If the code does not specifically identify silver diamine fluoride application, it becomes impossible to accurately track its utilization and evaluate its long-term outcomes. Accurate clinical documentation and adherence to coding guidelines are essential to ensure this specificity.
In conclusion, the principle of specificity is not merely a technical requirement but a fundamental component of ensuring accurate billing, comprehensive data analysis, and ultimately, improved patient care. The challenges in achieving specificity underscore the need for ongoing education and training for dental professionals, as well as continuous refinement of coding systems to reflect the evolving landscape of dental treatments. A commitment to precise coding promotes transparency, accountability, and evidence-based practice within the dental profession.
6. Updates
The code designated for silver diamine fluoride application is subject to periodic revisions and updates, mirroring changes in clinical practice, payer policies, and regulatory requirements. These updates are issued by authoritative bodies, such as the American Dental Association (ADA), and may encompass modifications to the code itself, associated coding guidelines, or related reimbursement policies. Failure to remain current with these updates can result in claim denials, inaccurate billing practices, and potential compliance issues. For example, a change in the code descriptor might specify a new age limitation for its use, or a payer might introduce a new documentation requirement for reimbursement. Ignoring such updates could lead to systematic errors in claim submissions.
The consequences of neglecting coding updates extend beyond immediate financial repercussions. Inaccurate coding data, stemming from the use of outdated codes, can skew epidemiological studies and public health initiatives that rely on coding information to track treatment trends and assess the effectiveness of various dental interventions. The accurate tracking of silver diamine fluoride utilization, for instance, is crucial for evaluating its long-term impact on caries prevention and management strategies. Furthermore, consistent use of outdated codes could raise concerns during audits and lead to accusations of improper billing practices, potentially resulting in legal penalties and reputational damage for the dental practice. Consequently, a proactive approach to monitoring and implementing coding updates is essential for maintaining accurate records, ensuring compliance, and supporting evidence-based decision-making in dental care.
In conclusion, coding updates represent a critical, ongoing process that directly impacts the financial and legal well-being of dental practices utilizing silver diamine fluoride. While the responsibility for implementing these updates often falls on billing specialists or practice managers, all members of the dental team should be aware of the importance of staying informed and adhering to the latest coding guidelines. Implementing a system for regularly monitoring coding updates, providing staff training, and updating billing software is essential for navigating the complexities of dental coding and maintaining compliance with evolving regulations. A commitment to continuous learning and adaptation is vital for ensuring that the code remains an accurate and reliable tool for representing silver diamine fluoride application in dental practice.
7. Audit trails
Audit trails are a critical component of responsible and compliant dental practice when utilizing the designated code for silver diamine fluoride (SDF). They provide a verifiable record of all actions related to the code, ensuring transparency and accountability in billing, documentation, and treatment administration.
-
Code Modification Tracking
Audit trails record any changes made to the code assignment in a patient’s record, including the date, time, and user who made the modification, as well as the original value. This functionality is essential for identifying and correcting errors in coding, detecting potential fraud or abuse, and verifying the accuracy of billing claims. For example, if a code is inadvertently changed from the appropriate SDF code to a more lucrative restorative code, the audit trail would immediately flag this discrepancy. The absence of such a mechanism introduces the possibility of undetected errors and potential legal ramifications.
-
Documentation of Rationale
An effective audit trail links the code selection to supporting documentation in the patient’s chart. This includes progress notes, radiographs, and informed consent forms that justify the medical necessity for SDF application. For instance, the audit trail should provide a direct link to the clinical note describing the caries lesions, the patient’s age and cooperation level, and the discussion of treatment options with the patient or guardian. This linkage demonstrates the rationale behind the code selection and provides evidence of adherence to established clinical guidelines. Without this clear connection, the code usage lacks context and may be viewed as arbitrary or unsubstantiated during an audit.
-
Access and Authorization Control
Audit trails track user access to sensitive coding and billing information, ensuring that only authorized personnel can modify or view records related to the SDF code. This helps prevent unauthorized changes or disclosures of patient data, protecting patient privacy and maintaining data integrity. For example, the system should record the IP address and username of anyone accessing a patient’s coding information, creating a clear trail of responsibility. Limitations on access are essential for maintaining data integrity.
-
Date and Time Stamps
Every action related to the SDF code, from initial entry to subsequent modifications, must be accurately date and time-stamped in the audit trail. This provides a chronological record of events, facilitating accurate reconstruction of the coding process and identifying potential anomalies. For instance, if a code is entered days or weeks after the service was rendered, this discrepancy would be immediately apparent in the audit trail, raising concerns about potential backdating or fraudulent activity. Precise timestamps provide a reliable timeline for validating coding practices and detecting inconsistencies.
The implementation of robust audit trails is not merely a technological consideration; it reflects a commitment to ethical and responsible dental practice when utilizing the code for silver diamine fluoride. It ensures accountability, promotes transparency, and provides a crucial safeguard against errors, fraud, and non-compliance, ultimately protecting both the patient and the dental practice.
8. Denial prevention
Successful reimbursement for silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application hinges on proactively mitigating factors that lead to claim denials. Inappropriate code selection stands as a primary cause of rejection. For instance, selecting a broad “preventive” code instead of the specific code for “caries arresting medicament application” can prompt an automatic denial. Inadequate documentation exacerbates the problem. If clinical notes lack clear justification for SDF use, such as evidence of active caries lesions and patient-specific needs (e.g., limited cooperation), the payer lacks sufficient information to validate the claim. Additionally, exceeding frequency limitations stipulated by payer policies leads to predictable rejections. Understanding and adhering to these policies, coupled with precise code selection and comprehensive documentation, forms the cornerstone of denial prevention. Failing to address these core issues guarantees increased administrative burden and diminished revenue.
A strategic approach to denial prevention extends beyond simple code accuracy. Verification of patient eligibility prior to treatment minimizes instances of claims submitted for ineligible individuals. Furthermore, pre-authorization, when required by the payer, establishes upfront approval for the service, significantly reducing the risk of subsequent denial. Training dental staff on coding guidelines, documentation requirements, and payer-specific policies is essential. Regular internal audits of coding practices and claim submissions identify potential vulnerabilities and allow for corrective action. A hypothetical scenario involves a practice that implements a checklist to ensure that all necessary documentation is present before submitting a claim for SDF. This proactive measure reduces errors and improves the likelihood of approval. Consistent attention to these details contributes to a streamlined billing process and enhanced financial stability.
Denial prevention, intrinsically linked to proper coding for silver diamine fluoride, represents a critical aspect of efficient dental practice management. Challenges persist in navigating the complexities of payer policies and maintaining up-to-date knowledge of coding changes. However, the financial and administrative benefits of proactive denial management outweigh the costs of reactive measures. By emphasizing accuracy, documentation, and adherence to payer guidelines, dental practices can minimize claim rejections, optimize revenue, and ensure the sustainability of providing this valuable treatment option. Ultimately, denial prevention serves as a proactive strategy aligned with the broader goal of providing high-quality, accessible dental care.
9. Training
Effective training is essential for dental professionals utilizing the code designated for silver diamine fluoride (SDF). Accurate coding and billing practices depend on a thorough understanding of coding guidelines, payer policies, and relevant regulations. Comprehensive training programs equip dental staff with the knowledge and skills necessary to ensure compliance and optimize reimbursement for this valuable treatment.
-
Accurate Code Selection
Training programs should emphasize the importance of selecting the most appropriate code for SDF application based on the specific circumstances of each case. This includes understanding the nuances of code descriptors, recognizing when to use different codes based on the number of teeth treated, and distinguishing SDF application from other caries management procedures. For example, training might include case studies that require participants to identify the correct code based on patient age, caries severity, and treatment goals. Incorrect code selection leads to claim denials and can expose the practice to compliance risks.
-
Documentation Standards
Effective training must address documentation requirements for SDF application, ensuring that clinical notes clearly justify the medical necessity for the procedure and accurately reflect the treatment provided. This includes documenting the presence of active caries lesions, the patient’s caries risk factors, the rationale for choosing SDF over other treatment options, and the patient’s informed consent. Training programs should provide practical examples of how to document SDF application effectively, including templates for progress notes and checklists for ensuring that all required information is included. Inadequate documentation is a leading cause of claim denials and audit findings.
-
Payer Policy Compliance
Training should familiarize dental staff with the specific coding and billing policies of major insurance payers in their region. This includes understanding coverage limitations, pre-authorization requirements, and documentation guidelines that are specific to each payer. Training programs might include interactive exercises that require participants to navigate payer websites, interpret policy documents, and complete sample claim forms. Non-compliance with payer policies results in rejected claims and can strain relationships with insurance providers.
-
Updates and Changes
Coding guidelines and payer policies are subject to periodic revisions and updates. Training programs should emphasize the importance of staying informed about these changes and implementing them promptly in coding and billing practices. This includes subscribing to coding newsletters, attending continuing education courses, and regularly reviewing coding updates from authoritative sources such as the ADA. Training programs should also provide practical guidance on how to update billing software and internal coding manuals to reflect the latest changes. Failure to stay current with coding updates can lead to systematic errors in claim submissions.
Comprehensive training, incorporating these facets, is not merely a perfunctory exercise, but a fundamental investment in the financial health and ethical integrity of dental practices utilizing the code for silver diamine fluoride. It transforms coding and billing from a potential liability into a source of revenue optimization and compliance assurance. By empowering dental professionals with the knowledge and skills to code accurately, document thoroughly, comply with payer policies, and stay abreast of coding updates, training facilitates appropriate reimbursement, reduces administrative burden, and supports the delivery of high-quality patient care.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the alphanumeric designation used for billing and record-keeping associated with silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application in dental practice.
Question 1: What is the specific code used for silver diamine fluoride application, and where can it be found?
The Current Dental Terminology (CDT) code, maintained by the American Dental Association (ADA), should be consulted for the most up-to-date and accurate code designation. Dental practices should reference the official CDT manual or electronic database for the appropriate code.
Question 2: Why is accurate coding essential for SDF application?
Accurate coding ensures proper claim adjudication by insurance payers, facilitates data collection for epidemiological studies, and supports compliance with billing regulations. Incorrect coding can lead to claim denials, audits, and compromised data integrity.
Question 3: What documentation is required to support claims using this code?
Documentation must include a clear justification for SDF application, detailing the presence of active caries lesions, patient-specific factors influencing treatment selection, and informed consent. Clinical notes, radiographs, and photographs may be required to validate the claim.
Question 4: How often are coding updates issued, and how can dental practices stay informed?
Coding updates are typically released annually by the ADA, with interim updates issued as needed. Dental practices should subscribe to coding newsletters, attend continuing education courses, and regularly consult the CDT manual to stay informed of changes.
Question 5: What steps should a dental practice take if a claim for SDF application is denied?
The dental practice should carefully review the payer’s explanation for the denial, correct any coding or documentation errors, and resubmit the claim with supporting documentation. If the denial is unjustified, an appeal process may be initiated.
Question 6: What are the potential consequences of fraudulent coding practices related to SDF application?
Fraudulent coding practices, such as upcoding or unbundling, can result in significant financial penalties, legal repercussions, and damage to the dental practice’s reputation. Compliance with ethical and legal guidelines is paramount.
This FAQ section provides a concise overview of key considerations regarding the use of the specific code for silver diamine fluoride. Ongoing education and diligent adherence to coding guidelines are essential for maintaining accurate billing practices.
The following section will explore clinical considerations for application.
Coding Guidelines
This section outlines vital considerations for the accurate use of the designated code for silver diamine fluoride (SDF), ensuring compliance and appropriate reimbursement.
Tip 1: Consult Official Resources: Prior to coding, reference the current edition of the Current Dental Terminology (CDT) manual published by the American Dental Association (ADA). This document provides the most accurate and up-to-date coding information. Any deviations from the CDT can lead to claim denials.
Tip 2: Document Medical Necessity: Detailed clinical notes must clearly justify the use of SDF. This includes recording the presence and severity of caries lesions, patient-specific factors influencing treatment decisions (e.g., age, cooperation level, medical conditions), and a discussion of alternative treatment options with the patient or guardian. Inadequate justification can lead to claim rejections.
Tip 3: Verify Payer Policies: Insurance companies often have specific policies regarding SDF coverage and coding. Review payer guidelines to ensure compliance with their requirements. For example, some payers may require pre-authorization for SDF application, while others may limit the number of SDF applications per patient per year.
Tip 4: Utilize Specific Codes: Avoid using general or unspecified codes when billing for SDF application. The CDT code should accurately reflect the specific service provided. Imprecise coding can lead to underpayment or claim denials.
Tip 5: Stay Updated: Coding guidelines and payer policies are subject to change. Regularly monitor coding updates and attend continuing education courses to stay informed of the latest developments. Failure to stay current can result in billing errors and compliance issues.
Tip 6: Audit Claims: Implement a system for regularly auditing claim submissions to identify and correct coding errors. This proactive approach helps prevent claim denials and reduces the risk of audits.
Tip 7: Maintain Detailed Records: Store all documentation related to SDF application, including clinical notes, radiographs, consent forms, and billing records. These records serve as evidence of compliance and support claims during audits.
Adherence to these coding guidelines promotes accurate billing practices and protects the financial integrity of the dental practice.
The subsequent sections will address the clinical application of silver diamine fluoride, emphasizing its proper use within a comprehensive dental care plan.
Conclusion
This exploration has detailed the intricacies surrounding the code for silver diamine fluoride. It has addressed the critical aspects of accuracy, reimbursement, documentation, compliance, specificity, updates, audit trails, and denial prevention. Understanding these facets is essential for integrating this therapeutic agent into dental practice effectively and ethically.
Continued vigilance and dedication to proper coding protocols are vital for ensuring both financial stability and high standards of patient care within the dental profession. A steadfast commitment to compliance will promote trust and optimal health outcomes.
