The item in question refers to a specific type of dollar coin minted by the United States government. The designation “1979 D” indicates that the coin was produced in the year 1979 at the Denver Mint. These coins, often referred to as Susan B. Anthony dollars, were intended to replace the larger Eisenhower dollar, but faced challenges in public acceptance due to their size similarity to the quarter.
The significance of this particular coin lies not only in its mint year and location, but also in its potential value to collectors depending on its condition and any existing errors. It represents a specific period of US coinage and is sought after as part of a complete collection of dollar coins. The mintage figures from the Denver Mint for this year contribute to determining its rarity and therefore, its value in the numismatic market.
Given its classification as a US coin with a specific date and mint mark, subsequent discussion will delve into its historical context, mintage figures, design features, and collectibility. This will provide a comprehensive understanding of the characteristics that make it a relevant item for collectors and students of US currency.
1. Coin Denomination
Coin denomination, as a fundamental attribute, defines the face value of any circulating currency. In the context of the “silver dollar 1979 d,” the denomination establishes its intended economic purpose and intrinsic value as a one-dollar currency unit within the United States monetary system. The subsequent points explore the specific implications of this denomination.
-
Face Value and Purchasing Power
The “silver dollar 1979 d” possessed a face value of one dollar. This value represented its purchasing power at the time of its circulation. It could be exchanged for goods or services equivalent to one dollar in value. However, due to its limited public acceptance, it did not widely circulate and its purchasing power was primarily theoretical in everyday transactions.
-
Legal Tender Status
As a legally issued coin by the US Mint, the “silver dollar 1979 d” held legal tender status. This designation meant it was legally required to be accepted as payment for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. However, despite this legal status, its unconventional size and similarity to the quarter often led to confusion and reluctance among vendors to accept it.
-
Denomination and Public Perception
The one-dollar denomination was intended to simplify transactions and potentially reduce the reliance on paper currency. However, the “silver dollar 1979 d’s” design, which closely resembled the quarter in size and weight, contributed to its unpopularity. The public struggled to differentiate it easily, hindering its intended function within the broader monetary system. This serves as a case study of how a denomination, despite its inherent value, can be impacted by design choices and public perception.
-
Historical Context of Dollar Coinage
The “silver dollar 1979 d” exists within a historical timeline of US dollar coins, from the Morgan dollar to the Eisenhower dollar. The decision to issue the Susan B. Anthony dollar with a smaller size was influenced by the practical considerations of metal costs and weight. However, the public’s resistance highlighted the importance of user-friendliness in currency design. Each generation of dollar coins reflects evolving considerations regarding design, metal composition, and circulation efficiency.
The denomination of the “silver dollar 1979 d” established its economic function, legal standing, and potential role within the US monetary system. Its limited success in circulation highlights the complexities of introducing new denominations and the importance of considering design and public acceptance. Studying its denomination within its historical and practical context provides valuable insight into the design and implementation of currency.
2. Year of Issue
The year of issue, 1979, is a pivotal element in defining the characteristics and historical context of the coin in question. It not only marks the coin’s production period but also anchors it within specific economic and socio-political circumstances that influenced its design, mintage, and reception.
-
Economic Conditions of 1979
The year 1979 was marked by significant economic challenges in the United States, including high inflation and an energy crisis. These factors influenced the public’s spending habits and acceptance of the new dollar coin. The perceived instability may have contributed to the reluctance to embrace a new form of currency, impacting its circulation and adoption.
-
Technological Advancements in Minting
The coin’s production in 1979 reflects the minting technologies of the late 1970s. These technologies would have influenced the precision, speed, and cost-effectiveness of its manufacture. Comparing the minting techniques of 1979 to those employed in earlier or later periods can reveal advancements in coin production and quality control.
-
Historical Significance of the Design
The selection of Susan B. Anthony for the coin’s obverse design was a deliberate choice tied to the feminist movement and the centennial of her birth. The year of issue coincided with ongoing debates about gender equality and representation. Understanding the historical significance of this choice provides insights into the cultural climate of the late 1970s and the intent behind the coin’s design.
-
First Year of Production Impact
As the inaugural year of production, 1979 holds particular importance for collectors. First-year issues often garner more attention and may command a higher premium in the numismatic market, especially if there are notable variations or errors in the initial minting runs. The “1979 D” examples are therefore examined closely for any such distinguishing characteristics.
In conclusion, the year 1979 is inextricably linked to the inherent qualities and historical significance of the item under discussion. It serves as a reference point for evaluating its production context, economic backdrop, and cultural relevance. The intersection of these factors contributes to its unique place within the broader history of United States coinage.
3. Denver Mint
The Denver Mint plays a crucial role in understanding the characteristics and potential value of the “silver dollar 1979 d.” The “D” mint mark signifies that the coin was struck at the Denver facility, distinguishing it from those produced at the Philadelphia Mint (no mint mark) or the San Francisco Mint (proof coins only, marked with “S”). The following points delineate the significance of this association.
-
Production Volume and Rarity
The Denver Mint’s production volume for the Susan B. Anthony dollar in 1979 directly influences the coin’s relative scarcity. If the Denver Mint produced a significantly larger or smaller number of these coins compared to Philadelphia, it affects the coin’s availability and, consequently, its potential value. Mintage figures from the Denver Mint are readily available and are a key factor in determining the coin’s desirability among collectors.
-
Quality Control and Variations
Different minting facilities may exhibit variations in striking quality, planchet preparation, or die usage. The Denver Mint’s specific procedures and equipment could have resulted in unique characteristics observed on “silver dollar 1979 d” coins struck there. These can include subtle differences in the sharpness of the strike, luster, or the presence of minor errors. Any such distinguishing features originating from the Denver Mint are of interest to numismatists.
-
Geographical Distribution and Preservation
The Denver Mint’s location in the western United States may have influenced the geographical distribution patterns of the “silver dollar 1979 d.” Coins struck at the Denver Mint might have been more prevalent in circulation in the western regions, potentially affecting their overall condition due to varying environmental factors and circulation patterns. Coins originating from the Denver Mint that are found in pristine condition are therefore considered more valuable.
-
Historical Significance of the Denver Mint
The Denver Mint itself has a long and storied history in the production of US coinage. Its role in producing the “silver dollar 1979 d” connects the coin to a larger narrative of American minting and economic development. Understanding the Denver Mint’s historical significance provides a broader context for appreciating the coin and its place within the nation’s monetary history.
The Denver Mint’s involvement in the creation of the “silver dollar 1979 d” is therefore a significant factor in assessing its value, rarity, and historical importance. By examining the mintage figures, quality variations, distribution patterns, and the overall history of the Denver Mint, a more complete understanding of the coin can be achieved.
4. Susan B. Anthony
The “silver dollar 1979 d” is intrinsically linked to Susan B. Anthony, the prominent figure of the 19th-century women’s rights movement. The United States Mint chose to honor Anthony by featuring her portrait on the dollar coin, making it the first circulating U.S. coin to depict a non-allegorical woman. The selection was a conscious decision to recognize Anthony’s tireless efforts in advocating for women’s suffrage and equality. The act of placing her likeness on a circulating coin aimed to raise awareness and commemorate her significant contributions to American society. The historical importance of Susan B. Anthony is therefore a core component of understanding the significance and intent behind the coin’s design.
The public’s reaction to the coin was multifaceted. While some lauded the recognition of a female historical figure, others criticized the design, particularly its size similarity to the quarter, which led to confusion and hindered its acceptance in everyday transactions. The design’s shortcomings ironically overshadowed the intent behind honoring Anthony. The practical significance of understanding this connection lies in appreciating the cultural and historical context surrounding the coin. Numismatists and historians alike recognize that the “silver dollar 1979 d” is more than just a piece of currency; it is a symbol of a pivotal moment in American history, representing both the strides made in recognizing women’s contributions and the challenges in effectively implementing commemorative designs.
In summary, the “silver dollar 1979 d” serves as a tangible representation of Susan B. Anthony’s legacy within the American narrative. While the coin itself faced practical challenges in circulation, its inherent connection to Anthony’s historical importance ensures its continued relevance. Studying the coin provides insights into the intersection of historical commemoration, monetary policy, and public perception, highlighting the complexities of designing and introducing new currency.
5. Metal Composition
The metal composition of the “silver dollar 1979 d” directly influences its intrinsic value, physical properties, and resistance to wear. Unlike earlier silver dollars composed of a silver alloy, this coin is primarily composed of copper and nickel. The specific alloy is 75% copper and 25% nickel bonded to a core of pure copper. This choice in metal composition was driven by economic considerations, aiming to reduce the cost of production compared to using precious metals. This composition also contributed to the coin’s metallic properties, including its color, weight, and conductivity. The absence of silver significantly differentiates it from earlier silver dollars and impacts its inherent worth based on the fluctuating market values of its constituent metals.
The impact of the chosen metal composition extends to the coin’s durability and resistance to corrosion. Copper-nickel alloys are generally more resistant to wear and tarnishing than pure copper, enhancing the coin’s longevity in circulation. However, the copper core can still be susceptible to environmental factors, potentially leading to discoloration or spotting over time. Collectors often assess the coin’s condition based on the degree of any such corrosion or blemishes, as these can detract from its numismatic value. The specific alloy also affects the coin’s weight and diameter, which contribute to its distinguishability from other denominations and influence its ease of handling.
In summary, the metal composition of the “silver dollar 1979 d” is a critical factor determining its intrinsic value, physical properties, and long-term preservation. The shift from silver to a copper-nickel alloy was a pragmatic decision driven by economic realities, impacting both its cost of production and its appeal to collectors. Understanding the metal composition provides valuable insights into the coin’s economic context and informs strategies for its preservation and valuation. The absence of silver, in particular, differentiates it significantly from earlier US dollar coins and influences its place within the broader history of American coinage.
6. Diameter/Weight
The diameter and weight of the “silver dollar 1979 d” are critical physical attributes influencing its acceptance and functionality as currency. The coin’s dimensions, 26.5 mm in diameter and weighing 8.1 grams, were intentionally smaller and lighter than the preceding Eisenhower dollar. This reduction in size and mass was intended to make the coin more convenient to carry and handle. However, these characteristics inadvertently contributed to its widespread confusion with the quarter, which has a similar size and weight. This confusion significantly hindered the coin’s acceptance in circulation and ultimately contributed to its limited success. The design flaw highlights the critical importance of distinct physical characteristics for different denominations of currency.
Consider the practical implications of these dimensions. Vending machines, designed to differentiate coins based on size and weight, often failed to accurately recognize the “silver dollar 1979 d.” This malfunction further reduced its usability. Furthermore, the similarity in size made it difficult for people, especially those with visual impairments, to distinguish it quickly from a quarter. In contrast, successful coins, such as the Sacagawea dollar, addressed this issue by utilizing a distinct golden color and a slightly larger diameter, facilitating easy recognition. The “silver dollar 1979 d” serves as a case study in the detrimental effects of neglecting the practical aspects of diameter and weight in coin design.
In conclusion, the diameter and weight of the “silver dollar 1979 d” were pivotal factors in its failure to gain widespread acceptance. These physical attributes, intended to improve convenience, instead created confusion and hindered its practicality as a circulating currency. This example underscores the necessity for careful consideration of physical characteristics in coin design, ensuring clear differentiation between denominations and facilitating ease of use. The lessons learned from this coin have informed subsequent approaches to dollar coin design, emphasizing the importance of both aesthetic appeal and functional utility.
7. Collectibility
The collectibility of the “silver dollar 1979 d” is a multifaceted phenomenon driven by factors including its historical context, relative scarcity, and condition. While not inherently rare in terms of original mintage numbers, specific variations and high-grade examples command premiums within the numismatic market. The Susan B. Anthony dollar, in general, represents a distinct period in U.S. coinage history, and the “1979 d” example is a representative specimen of that era. The initial public resistance to the coin, coupled with its short period of circulation, paradoxically contributes to its desirability among collectors seeking to complete sets of U.S. currency. The collectibility stems from the intersection of its historical significance, its relative unavailability in pristine condition, and the enduring appeal of completing a comprehensive collection.
The condition of a given “silver dollar 1979 d” significantly impacts its value to collectors. Coins exhibiting minimal wear, retaining their original luster, and free from noticeable blemishes are graded higher and fetch correspondingly higher prices. Specific errors, such as the “near date” and “far date” varieties found in the 1979 Philadelphia minted coins, further amplify collectibility, although similar errors are not commonly found on the “D” mint mark versions. The numismatic value is further enhanced by third-party grading services that assess and certify the authenticity and condition of the coin, providing collectors with a standardized benchmark for valuation. Therefore, the practical understanding of grading standards and the recognition of potential errors are crucial for those engaging in the collection of these coins.
Ultimately, the collectibility of the “silver dollar 1979 d” hinges on a combination of objective factors, such as mintage figures and condition, and subjective considerations, like historical appeal and personal preferences of collectors. While it may not be considered a highly valuable coin compared to certain other U.S. issues, its significance within the context of U.S. monetary history and its representation of the Susan B. Anthony dollar series contribute to its enduring collectibility. The challenges lie in accurately assessing its condition and identifying any potential variations that enhance its numismatic worth. The coin serves as a reminder that collectibility is a dynamic attribute, influenced by historical context, market forces, and the evolving interests of collectors over time.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions address common inquiries regarding the “silver dollar 1979 d,” providing factual information to clarify its characteristics and value.
Question 1: What determines the value of a “silver dollar 1979 d?”
The value is primarily determined by its condition, as graded by numismatic experts. Uncirculated examples with original mint luster are worth more than circulated coins exhibiting wear. Mintage figures, while relatively high, play a role. Demand from collectors seeking to complete sets also influences the market value.
Question 2: Is the “silver dollar 1979 d” made of silver?
No. It is composed of a copper-nickel clad alloy, consisting of 75% copper and 25% nickel bonded to a core of pure copper. It does not contain any silver.
Question 3: How can one distinguish a “silver dollar 1979 d” from a quarter?
Although similar in size, a careful examination reveals distinct differences. The dollar coin bears the portrait of Susan B. Anthony and the denomination “One Dollar.” The edge of the dollar coin is smooth, while the quarter’s edge is reeded. The color also differs subtly, with the dollar coin having a slightly brighter metallic appearance.
Question 4: Where was the “silver dollar 1979 d” minted?
The “D” mint mark indicates that the coin was struck at the Denver Mint, located in Denver, Colorado. Coins without a mint mark were struck at the Philadelphia Mint.
Question 5: Are there any known errors associated with the “silver dollar 1979 d?”
While not as prevalent as errors found on the 1979 Philadelphia minted Susan B. Anthony dollars, minor die variations or striking errors may exist. These errors, if authenticated by a reputable grading service, can enhance the coin’s collectibility.
Question 6: What is the historical significance of the Susan B. Anthony dollar?
The Susan B. Anthony dollar holds historical significance as the first circulating U.S. coin to depict a non-allegorical woman. It commemorates Anthony’s contributions to the women’s rights movement. Despite its limited circulation, it serves as a tangible reminder of efforts to recognize women’s achievements in American history.
In summary, the “silver dollar 1979 d” is a distinctive coin with specific characteristics that influence its value and collectibility. Understanding these attributes is crucial for anyone interested in collecting or investing in U.S. coinage.
The subsequent sections will address preservation techniques and strategies for building a valuable collection of “silver dollar 1979 d” coins.
Tips for Collecting “Silver Dollar 1979 D”
The following tips provide guidance for effectively collecting the coin in question, maximizing potential value and minimizing risks associated with numismatic acquisitions.
Tip 1: Prioritize Uncirculated Examples: Coins in uncirculated condition, designated as Mint State (MS) by grading services, exhibit original mint luster and lack wear from circulation. These specimens command higher premiums and represent a sounder long-term investment.
Tip 2: Inspect for Surface Preservation: Examine coins carefully for surface imperfections, such as scratches, spots, or evidence of cleaning. Such flaws diminish the coin’s grade and value. Use proper magnification tools for detailed inspection.
Tip 3: Acquire Certified Coins: Purchase coins graded and encapsulated by reputable third-party grading services (e.g., PCGS, NGC). Certification authenticates the coin and provides a standardized assessment of its condition, reducing the risk of acquiring counterfeits or overgraded examples.
Tip 4: Understand Mintage Figures: While the “1979 D” mint mark coin isn’t particularly rare, knowing the mintage figures can help contextualize its scarcity relative to other dates and mints in the Susan B. Anthony series.
Tip 5: Utilize Specialized Resources: Consult numismatic reference guides, price listings, and online forums to stay informed about current market values and trends. Informed decisions are crucial for successful collecting.
Tip 6: Store Coins Properly: Employ archival-quality holders and storage containers to protect coins from environmental damage. Avoid handling coins directly with bare hands, as skin oils can accelerate deterioration.
Tip 7: Document Acquisitions: Maintain a detailed inventory of all acquired coins, including purchase dates, prices paid, grading information, and provenance (if available). This documentation is essential for insurance purposes and potential future sales.
By adhering to these tips, collectors can navigate the complexities of the numismatic market and build a valuable and rewarding collection of these coins. Careful attention to detail and a commitment to acquiring certified, well-preserved examples are paramount.
The subsequent section will provide a conclusion and summarize the main point of the article to the subject silver dollar 1979 d.
Conclusion
The preceding discussion has explored the various facets of the “silver dollar 1979 d,” encompassing its design origins, economic context, minting details, and its standing within the numismatic community. The coin, while initially met with public resistance, represents a significant moment in US coinage history, marking the first time a non-allegorical woman was featured on a circulating coin. Its metal composition, diameter, weight, and production at the Denver Mint each contribute to its unique characteristics and value to collectors.
Despite its historical significance, the “silver dollar 1979 d” serves as a testament to the importance of considering practical factors alongside symbolic representation in currency design. Continued study and appreciation of this coin ensure that its historical and numismatic significance remains preserved, providing future generations with a tangible link to a specific period in American history and a valuable lesson in the complexities of currency design and public acceptance.
